You won’t find performance hype here.
You’ll find structural truth.
Each case study answers a deeper question:
Was the portfolio fragile — or resilient?
Did it manage risk intelligently — or react emotionally?
Was it built to survive regime shifts — or optimized for the past?
Was the result luck — or the product of intelligent design?
If you're looking for real-world evidence of what happens when you apply first principles to portfolio construction—
this is it.
Each case follows the same diagnostic-to-redesign structure:
The Structural Problem
The Sigma Score™ Analysis
The Redesign (via Quantum Portfolio System™)
The Structural Result
Key Takeaway
Structural Problem:
Traditional 60/40 collapsed during an inflation regime.
Bonds and equities moved together — creating hidden correlation and fragile outcomes.
Sigma Score™ Before:
Sigma Score™ After:
Redesign:
Introduced regime-based diversification, rebalanced risk symmetry, rebuilt core exposures.
Takeaway:
Stability doesn’t come from diversification by name.
It comes from diversification by structure.
Structural Problem:
Strategy churn. Emotional decisions. Performance that spiked and crashed.
The portfolio wasn’t broken because of timing — it was broken by design.
Sigma Score™ Before:
Sigma Score™ After:
Redesign:
Shifted from narrative-driven allocation to system-first design.
Added behavioral guardrails, risk balance, and clarity.
Takeaway:
Confidence doesn’t come from guessing right.
It comes from knowing your portfolio is built to adapt.
Structural Problem:
Legacy 401(k) model held 9 asset classes — but all moved together under pressure.
Overweight equities, under-diversified across regimes.
Sigma Score™ Before:
Sigma Score™ After:
Redesign:
Mapped exposures to macro environments, layered risk by volatility bands, stress-tested scenarios.
Takeaway:
If you don’t stress-test before the storm,
the storm will stress-test it for you.
Every case study began with a single diagnostic:
The Sigma Score™ —
a composite 0–100 system that tells you how structurally sound a portfolio really is.
It measures how well the portfolio handles:
🧱 Stability — How it behaves under stress
🧬 Resilience — How fast it recovers from loss
🎯 Efficiency — How precisely it converts risk into return
If you want to know what your portfolio is really saying —
this is the first step.
You don’t need more market opinions.
You need a way to see fragility before it becomes failure.
This training walks through:
What the Sigma Score measures
How to interpret the radar chart
Why most portfolios break — and how this one doesn't
None of this is theoretical.
None of it is performance theater.
Every transformation here happened because of one thing:
Structure.
The portfolio doesn’t just survive.
© 2025 | TheMarkJohnson™ | All Rights Reserved |
Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy