📊 Proof Over Promises

When You Build the Right Structure,

The Results Speak for Themselves.

These aren’t marketing stories.
They’re portfolio autopsies and architectural turnarounds

—where fragile structures were exposed, redesigned, and rebuilt

using Intelligent Portfolio Design™.

This is where theory becomes reality.
And where “good enough” gets left behind.

đź§± Why This Page Exists

What These Case Studies Are (and What They’re Not)

This isn’t about performance chest-pounding.
This is about structural truth.

Each case study answers a deeper question:

  • Was the portfolio fragile or resilient?

  • Did it manage risk intelligently—or react emotionally?

  • Was it designed to survive different regimes—or optimized for the past?

  • Was the outcome luck—or the result of better design?

If you're looking for real-world evidence of what happens when you apply first principles to portfolio construction—

this is it.

đź“‚ Featured Case Studies

Note: Each study follows a consistent structure:

  • The Problem

  • The Analysis (via Sigma Score)

  • The Redesign (via Quantum Portfolio System)

  • The Result

  • The Takeaway

🧱 Case Study: “The 60/40 That Couldn’t Hold”

Client Type: Disillusioned Fiduciary
Problem: Hidden fragility + underperformance in a traditional allocation
Sigma Score Before: 42
Redesign: Rebalanced by economic environment, introduced risk symmetry
Sigma Score After: 79
Takeaway: Stability doesn’t come from more diversification. It comes from better structure.
🔗 Read Full Case Study →

🎯 Case Study: “The DIY Investor Who Got Whipsawed”

Client Type: Strategic Maximizer
Problem: Emotionally reactive decisions, inconsistent performance
Sigma Score Before: 38
Redesign: Shifted from prediction-based to system-driven strategy
Sigma Score After: 82
Takeaway: Confidence comes from knowing your portfolio is built to adapt.
🔗 Read Full Case Study →

🏛️ Case Study: “The Retirement Plan No One Stress-Tested”

Client Type: Financial Advisor / Plan Fiduciary
Problem: No downside protection, overweight in correlated assets
Sigma Score Before: 46
Redesign: Introduced true diversification + risk rebalancing
Sigma Score After: 85
Takeaway: If you don’t test it before the storm, the storm will test it for you.
🔗 Read Full Case Study →

🧬 What the Sigma Score Reveals

Your Portfolio Has a Voice.
The Sigma Score Lets It Speak.

Each case study begins with a Sigma Score analysis —

a 0–100 composite that measures how well your portfolio manages

the 12 dimensions of risk across three core traits:

  • Stability

  • Resilience

  • Efficiency

Most investors are flying blind.
The Sigma Score turns on the instrument panel.

If you want to know what your portfolio is really saying —

this is the first step.

âś… The Bottom Line

What You’re Seeing Isn’t Magic.

It’s Mechanics.

Every outcome here is the result of structure, not speculation.

Because when you shift from prediction to preparation…
From noise to numbers…
From emotion to engineering…

The portfolio doesn’t just perform better.
It becomes unshakable.

© 2025 | TheMarkJohnson™ | All Rights Reserved  | 

Terms & Conditions |  Privacy Policy